Conference Standings

DivisionFBSFCSD2D3
Big South Ovc Tournament Projections(8 teams Β· 10k simulations)
SeedTeamEloFinalπŸ† Win
1UT Martin151443%26%
2Gardner-Webb148338%21%
3Lindenwood147132%16%
4Charleston So.143826%12%
5Southeast Mo. St.141821%10%
6Western Ill.140218%7%
7Eastern Ill.135113%4%
8Tennessee St.134010%4%

Values = P(reach that stage or further). Win = P(win conference tournament = auto NCAA bid). Seeds reflect average simulated finish position.

Big South Ovc Standings
2 qualify for championship gamePreseason projection Β· 24 games remaining

Snapshot Week

Standings Β· Finishing Position Probabilities

#TeamConfOverallProj ConfProj Ovr12345678
1UT Martin0–00–0
3.6–2.4
3–4 W
3.6–2.4
3–4 W
25181512108.56.34.9
2Gardner-Webb0–00–0
3.5–2.5
3–4 W
3.5–2.5
3–4 W
20181513139.17.45.2
3Lindenwood0–00–0
3.3–2.7
3–4 W
3.3–2.7
3–4 W
1616151412119.36.7
4Charleston So.0–00–0
3.1–2.9
2–4 W
3.1–2.9
2–4 W
1313141313121110
5Southeast Mo. St.0–00–0
2.9–3.1
2–4 W
2.9–3.1
2–4 W
9.212131213151413
6Western Ill.0–00–0
2.8–3.2
2–4 W
2.8–3.2
2–4 W
8.110111314141515
7Eastern Ill.0–00–0
2.5–3.5
2–3 W
2.5–3.5
2–3 W
5.17.4101113141821
8Tennessee St.0–00–0
2.3–3.7
2–3 W
2.3–3.7
2–3 W
4.16.27.91112161924

Position columns: % of 10,000 simulated seasons finishing there. Row below cut line = P(reach championship game).

Finishing Position Range β€” Season Progression

UT MartinGardner-WebbLindenwoodCharleston So.Southeast Mo. St.Western Ill.Eastern Ill.Tennessee St.
12345678PreseasonPosition