Conference Standings
Southland Tournament Projections(10 teams · 10k simulations)
| Seed | Team | Elo | Final | 🏆 Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SF Austin | 1616 | 55% | 35% |
| 2 | UTRGV | 1559 | 41% | 21% |
| 3 | Southeastern La. | 1557 | 37% | 19% |
| 4 | Lamar | 1496 | 26% | 11% |
| 5 | UIW | 1487 | 16% | 7% |
| 6 | McNeese | 1442 | 9% | 3% |
| 7 | Nicholls | 1418 | 10% | 3% |
| 8 | East Texas A&M | 1373 | 4% | 1% |
| 9 | Houston Christian | 1306 | 2% | — |
| 10 | Northwestern St. | 1253 | 1% | — |
Values = P(reach that stage or further). Win = P(win conference tournament = auto NCAA bid). Seeds reflect average simulated finish position.
Southland Standings
2 qualify for championship gamePreseason projection · 40 games remainingSnapshot Week
Standings · Finishing Position Probabilities
| # | Team | Conf | Overall | Proj Conf | Proj Ovr | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SF Austin | 0–0 | 0–0 | 5.7–2.4 5–7 W | 5.7–2.4 5–7 W | 33 | 22 | 15 | 11 | 8.1 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2 | UTRGV | 0–0 | 0–0 | 5.2–2.8 4–6 W | 5.2–2.8 4–6 W | 22 | 18 | 16 | 13 | 10 | 7.7 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| 3 | Southeastern La. | 0–0 | 0–0 | 5.1–2.9 4–6 W | 5.1–2.9 4–6 W | 18 | 19 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 8.6 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 4 | Lamar | 0–0 | 0–0 | 4.8–3.2 4–6 W | 4.8–3.2 4–6 W | 12 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 8.6 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 1.3 |
| 5 | UIW | 0–0 | 0–0 | 4.2–3.8 3–5 W | 4.2–3.8 3–5 W | 6.1 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 9.1 | 6.1 | 3.2 |
| 6 | McNeese | 0–0 | 0–0 | 3.7–4.3 3–5 W | 3.7–4.3 3–5 W | 3.2 | 5.8 | 8.4 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 10 | 6.9 |
| 7 | Nicholls | 0–0 | 0–0 | 3.7–4.3 3–5 W | 3.7–4.3 3–5 W | 3.6 | 6.2 | 8.5 | 10 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 7.4 |
| 8 | East Texas A&M | 0–0 | 0–0 | 3.1–4.9 2–4 W | 3.1–4.9 2–4 W | 1.1 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 13 |
| 9 | Houston Christian | 0–0 | 0–0 | 2.5–5.5 2–3 W | 2.5–5.5 2–3 W | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 13 | 17 | 23 | 25 |
| 10 | Northwestern St. | 0–0 | 0–0 | 2.0–6.0 1–3 W | 2.0–6.0 1–3 W | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 3.5 | 5.4 | 8.4 | 14 | 24 | 41 |
Position columns: % of 10,000 simulated seasons finishing there. Row below cut line = P(reach championship game).
Finishing Position Range — Season Progression
SF AustinUTRGVSoutheastern La.LamarUIWMcNeeseNichollsEast Texas A&MHouston ChristianNorthwestern St.