2026 CAA Volleyball Championship

🏟 CAA
First Round
3Seed 3
6Seed 6
4Seed 4
5Seed 5
Semifinals
1Seed 1
TBD
2Seed 2
TBD
Championship
TBD
TBD
CAA Tournament Projections(11 teams Β· 10k simulations)
SeedTeamEloQuartersSemisFinalπŸ† Win
1Hofstra168298%87%57%33%
2Towson161289%67%36%18%
3Campbell159192%69%35%17%
4Col. of Charleston157691%69%34%16%
5N.C. A&T152674%46%20%9%
6Stony Brook141744%21%7%3%
7William & Mary139345%20%6%2%
8Northeastern131638%13%3%1%
9Elon124421%6%1%β€”
10UNCW121210%2%β€”β€”
11Hampton850β€”β€”β€”β€”

Values = P(reach that stage or further). Win = P(win conference tournament = auto NCAA bid). Seeds reflect average simulated finish position.

CAA Standings
6 qualify for tournamentPreseason projection Β· 88 games remaining

Snapshot Week

Standings Β· Finishing Position Probabilities

#TeamConfOverallProj ConfProj Ovr1234567891011
1Hofstra0–00–0
12.6–3.4
11–14 W
12.6–3.4
11–14 W
4025159.15.33.01.60.40.3<1
2Col. of Charleston0–00–0
11.2–4.8
10–13 W
11.2–4.8
10–13 W
18211914117.35.02.61.20.5
3Campbell0–00–0
11.0–5.0
9–13 W
11.0–5.0
9–13 W
15192017128.44.82.20.90.3<1
4Towson0–00–0
10.7–5.3
9–12 W
10.7–5.3
9–12 W
1717171612106.03.11.50.3<1
5N.C. A&T0–00–0
9.2–6.8
7–11 W
9.2–6.8
7–11 W
6.69.413151614128.14.61.9<1
6William & Mary0–00–0
7.4–8.6
6–9 W
7.4–8.6
6–9 W
0.92.85.78.912141717147.90.3
7Stony Brook0–00–0
7.2–8.8
5–9 W
7.2–8.8
5–9 W
1.73.55.38.41114151614110.7
8Northeastern0–00–0
7.0–9.0
5–9 W
7.0–9.0
5–9 W
0.41.53.56.71115171716121.1
9Elon0–00–0
5.8–10.2
4–7 W
5.8–10.2
4–7 W
0.20.71.53.65.98.7121721252.9
10UNCW0–00–0
4.9–11.1
3–6 W
4.9–11.1
3–6 W
<10.20.41.12.85.5101626334.9
11Hampton0–00–0
0.9–15.1
0–1 W
0.9–15.1
0–1 W
<1<10.11.38.590

Position columns: % of 10,000 simulated seasons finishing there. Row below cut line = P(reach tournament).

Finishing Position Range β€” Season Progression

HofstraCol. of CharlestonCampbellTowsonN.C. A&TWilliam & MaryStony BrookNortheasternElonUNCWHampton
1234567891011PreseasonPosition