2026 MAC Volleyball Championship
π MAC
First Round
Semifinals
Championship
MAC Tournament Projections(6 teams Β· 10k simulations)
| Seed | Team | Elo | Quarters | Semis | Final | π Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ball State | 1722 | 96% | 82% | 82% | 56% |
| 2 | Toledo | 1613 | 83% | 53% | 33% | 14% |
| 3 | W Michigan | 1613 | 83% | 54% | 33% | 14% |
| 4 | Bowling Green | 1576 | 76% | 38% | 21% | 8% |
| 5 | Ohio | 1530 | 65% | 28% | 12% | 4% |
| 6 | UMass | 1500 | 57% | 19% | 8% | 2% |
| 7 | Akron | 1485 | 53% | 15% | 6% | 2% |
| 8 | Miami (OH) | 1418 | 35% | 6% | 2% | β |
| 9 | C Michigan | 1359 | 22% | 3% | 1% | β |
| 10 | E Michigan | 1327 | 16% | 2% | β | β |
| 11 | NIU | 1310 | 13% | 1% | β | β |
| 12 | Kent State | 1152 | 2% | β | β | β |
Values = P(reach that stage or further). Win = P(win conference tournament = auto NCAA bid). Seeded by Elo.
MAC Standings
6 qualify for tournamentThrough 2026-06-08 Β· 45 games remainingStandings Β· Finishing Position Probabilities
| # | Team | Conf | Overall | Proj Conf | Proj Ovr | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ball State | 0β0 | 0β0 | 16.1β3.9 | 16.1β3.9 | 59 | 24 | 10 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | <1 | ||||
| 2 | Toledo | 0β0 | 0β0 | 14.3β7.7 | 14.3β7.7 | 19 | 28 | 22 | 16 | 10 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | <1 | ||
| 3 | Ohio | 0β0 | 0β0 | 13.1β8.9 | 13.1β8.9 | 8.9 | 18 | 24 | 23 | 17 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | ||
| 4 | Bowling Green | 0β0 | 0β0 | 12.9β9.1 | 12.9β9.1 | 9.1 | 19 | 22 | 22 | 17 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | ||
| 5 | Akron | 0β0 | 0β0 | 10.8β9.2 | 10.8β9.2 | 3.9 | 11 | 18 | 22 | 22 | 13 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | ||
| 6 | W Michigan | 0β0 | 0β0 | 7.1β4.9 | 7.1β4.9 | <1 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 8.5 | 21 | 37 | 17 | 8.1 | 3.6 | 0.8 | ||
| 7 | Miami (OH) | 0β0 | 0β0 | 5.5β10.5 | 5.5β10.5 | <1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 15 | 24 | 22 | 19 | 7.8 | ||
| 8 | C Michigan | 0β0 | 0β0 | 3.8β8.2 | 3.8β8.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 8.5 | 21 | 27 | 26 | 14 | ||||
| 9 | E Michigan | 0β0 | 0β0 | 3.4β8.6 | 3.4β8.6 | <1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 6.7 | 18 | 25 | 28 | 20 | |||
| 10 | Kent State | 0β0 | 0β0 | 2.9β19.1 | 2.9β19.1 | <1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 7.1 | 12 | 20 | 57 | ||||
| 11 | UMass | 0β0 | 0β0 | 0.0β0.0 | 0.0β0.0 | 51 | 49 | ||||||||||
| 12 | NIU | 0β0 | 0β0 | 0.0β0.0 | 0.0β0.0 | 49 | 51 |
Position columns: % of 10,000 simulated seasons finishing there. Row below cut line = P(reach tournament).
Finishing Position Range β Season Progression
Ball StateToledoOhioBowling GreenAkronW MichiganMiami (OH)C MichiganE MichiganKent StateUMassNIU